Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - BrookFan

Pages: [1] 2
1
SBU Men's Basketball / Re: Game 10: v Columbia, 12/9 7pm
« on: December 10, 2025, 10:17:33 am »
I'm impressed we gutted it out in OT. Up 16 w/ 3:27 to go, ESPN had our WP% at 99.8%. Would have been devastating to give that away. But we came up with some big stops and boards late and some clutch FT shooting after some shaky stripe work to end regulation.

It's baffling to me how we can't break the press more consistently. How many times did we dribble or feed the ball to a corner or sideline without Columbia forcing us there? The opposite skip pass was open all night, and we only got it there once or twice, but that's what pressure does. It speeds you up and narrows your vision, and things can snowball after a turnover or two. We need to be better--we haven't been a good press-breaking team for a while.

Great win! Onto Central Michigan!

2
SBU Men's Lacrosse / Re: SB Lacrosse 2026 Season
« on: December 08, 2025, 03:52:57 pm »
'26 home slate announced!

A solid lineup includes:

--Blue-blooded UVA
--Towson, #15 in final '25 rankings
--Rutgers, #19 in final '25 rankings
--Drexel, RV in final '25 rankings
--Rivalry game with Hofstra

3
SBU Women's Lacrosse / Re: 2026 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
« on: December 08, 2025, 03:31:45 pm »
What a home lineup at LaValle for women's lax in '26!
5 teams from the top 38 of the final 2025 rankings including perennial power Northwestern (#3), Denver (#21), Colorado (#32), Rutgers (#35), and Arizona St. (#38).

We already know the men are hosting UVA in Feb.

Men's & women's lax consistently provides the thrill of big/brand-name/nationally-ranked schools coming to town. What a treat. Already excited for the spring!

4
SBU Men's Lacrosse / Re: SB Lacrosse 2026 Season
« on: December 03, 2025, 01:13:55 pm »

5
SBU Men's Basketball / Re: Game 5: v Brown, 11/20 6:30pm
« on: November 20, 2025, 11:37:38 am »
I remember falling in love with Woodhouse's game while he was at Harborfields, and I was so excited when he came home after his time at Longwood. Always knew what buttons to push or what gear to hit, depending on the time and score. Probably trusted the ball in his hands more than any other PG I've seen at SBU. So clutch. What a joy he was to watch.

6
SBU Men's Basketball / Re: Game 1: v Farmingdale State, 11/3 6:30pm
« on: October 31, 2025, 11:16:38 am »
Did anyone go to Meet the Team Night? I think they usually have a three-point shootout and this and that otherwise. Curious if anybody caught any glimpses.

I was at Meet the Team. Jake Harbatkin (freshman) hit 13/15 in the first round of the 3-point contest, then hit 11/15 in the final round to win it. Not sure how much time he's projected to get, but he can knock down an open shot.

What I like is that, in the day and age of pace and space, a 6-3 SG plays a little bit more because you can stash him in a corner. This is not an apples to apples comparison, but as more or less a non-penetrator, Luster did well as an open shooter and coming around screens. Harbatkin's a walk-on so I don't know about time. Daeger is a scholarship kid at 6-3 also so maybe he's somebody who can help in that regard also.

At VOTP said in another thread, we could/should go 3-0. I was wondering today about scheduling these D-III pushovers. I've said before that I wish they were exhibitions and we could just schedule D-Is across the board. That's unlikely for just about everybody – I've read that 265 out of 365 D-I teams have at least one sub D-I on their schedule. Biblical Studies and Virginia Lynchburg play nine D-Is apiece and that's just the start of it. I had wondered what % of doing this is get everybody into a game, what % is padding a team's win total, and what % is something I'm not thinking of. For example, on Monday, Stonehill plays Thomas (ME). Why can't Stony Brook just play Stonehill? Or Central Connecticut, who's instead playing Vermont State - Johnson? Penn, don't play Rowan, play us. Fans are paying full price for an absolute massacre when it could be a competitive game to kick off the season.


I definitely agree with your scheduling point. I'd much rather see a Stonehill, CCU, or an Ivy on Monday night, but as a former DIII athlete, I'd have loved the chance to play a DI team, so it's cool that Farmingdale and St. Joe's will have that experience. The stats you pulled are really interesting. I would not have guessed that many DIs play sub-DIs.

7
SBU Men's Basketball / Re: Game 1: v Farmingdale State, 11/3 6:30pm
« on: October 30, 2025, 02:29:37 pm »
Did anyone go to Meet the Team Night? I think they usually have a three-point shootout and this and that otherwise. Curious if anybody caught any glimpses.

I was at Meet the Team. Jake Harbatkin (freshman) hit 13/15 in the first round of the 3-point contest, then hit 11/15 in the final round to win it. Not sure how much time he's projected to get, but he can knock down an open shot.

8
SBU Football / Re: 2025 Game 2 - Home Opener - vs. #9 Rhode Island
« on: September 07, 2025, 12:12:08 am »
Have we ever taken a snap at home after midnight? 1am?

Those remaining in the stands are the real ones.

My son and I were there til the bitter end!

9
SBU Baseball / Re: 2025 Baseball Season
« on: May 09, 2025, 09:58:07 am »
Coach Senk is our Mark Few, a guy who took an unheralded program and turned it into a respected one across the country--except Few didn't take Gonzaga Basketball up from DIII! What I appreciate about both coaches is their loyalty to one university. I'm sure Coach Senk had many opportunities over the years to leverage his success into roles and raises at bigger programs, but he stayed and was committed to the Seawolves. There are fewer and fewer of those coaches in college athletics, and we're losing a great one.

10
SBU Women's Lacrosse / Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
« on: April 28, 2025, 09:50:42 am »
12 regular season titles in a row! The longest conference-winning streak by any team in any sport in the NCAA continues. The dynasty rolls on!

11
SBU Women's Lacrosse / Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
« on: April 21, 2025, 09:26:51 am »
The team came out ready to play. They ran out to an 11-3 lead, then led 16-7 late in the 3rdQ with a free position chance that could have triggered a running clock, but Drexel made the save and then ran off five straight goals to pull within 4 with plenty of time left. The defense dug in and held them to just one goal over the final 9:11.

The game didn't feel as close as the final score, but Drexel is tough, fast, and never stops fighting. We'll likely see them again in the final, but at least it'll be at home!

12
Conference and Athletics / Re: Conference Realignment Rumors
« on: March 31, 2025, 03:18:32 pm »
Gents, I just don't feel that level of abject pessimism.

Will we become the next Ohio State? Unlikely. However, the schools that are dropping have a lot of intrinsic problems beyond athletics. The college world has changed as pricing has soared and debt becomes more expensive. People can't go to small lib arts or parochial colleges to earn degrees that don't make money anymore.

Stony Brook, in contrast, is a large state that is VERY good at subfields that do earn a lot of money. It is an AAU school with a growing endowment and a ton going for it. While we may be disappointed at times by athletics, I would argue that the University as a whole has never been stronger.

We have an athletics image problem. That is absolutely fixable but takes time. I've learned about that a lot through my career. I work for a large health system in NY. It was largely considered a Bronx hospital that caters to inner city medicaid (which it does, and should). However, it now owns several hospitals in Westchester and Rockland counties that are in much more affluent areas. Even with this expanded offering, the admin here fully gets that it takes a good decade to overhaul an image, almost a generational commitment. It's slowly changing, but even if the care is better - perception is 9/10's of reality.

Stony Brook is the same. Pikiell worked on this place for nearly a decade and made notable progress. That shows that it is possible with real commitment. We have backslid since the 2010's, when Stanley had an athletic interest and Pikiell knew how to market it. Part of that is the quality of the product on the court, and I don't like our coaching staff. Hopefully football taught Heilbron how important the right coach is in this portal environment. However, as football taught us, 1 season can change the product pretty drastically, and multiple seasons help that image change happen.

There is NO danger of us dropping D1. Not even a mild one. We're just not going to. I even expect us to make another conference move once the dust settles from NIL and the related lawsuits. If the admin wants to really push the image, they have to start a 10 year plan to do so, and accept that dividends won't really be paid until the end of that plan.

Really good points here. I share your optimism for SBU's potential, and I don't fear that we'll suffer the same fate as a Saint Francis. I do worry about our ability to recruit and retain talent when we are significantly behind the top NIL funds/endowments in our own conference. I'm hopeful that will change, but it will take a new level of commitment and a fresh vision from leadership.

More globally, I am very glad that college athletes are being compensated for the significant value they bring to their schools. I do lament the haphazard way NIL was implemented after the Supreme Court forced the NCAA's hand in 2020. It has completely shifted the landscape, and we still have no idea where it will settle. It did not start with any strategy, design, or structure, so I think we're all just waiting for a train with no breaks to eventually come to rest.

Will a Cinderella make a multi-round run in March Madness ever again? Will my son be able to root for his favorite Seawolf for multiple years in the future? Will the 'Bamas and Georgias and Texases break off completely from the NCAA and make an independently-governed super conference?

I've always loved college sports way more than professional. Increasingly, it's hard to tell the difference. Maybe I just need to go with the flow, but I also don't want to see things lost that make college sports special.

13
SBU Men's Lacrosse / Re: SB Lacrosse 2025 Season
« on: March 31, 2025, 02:51:13 pm »
furious ending but won 17-6.  biggest win a while.  first coastal win this year, and FU will drop like a rock straight out of the top 20.  this probably doesnt erase the bingo/SHU losses, but it's a start. 

FU was probably a bit overrated as they got to #12 by not losing; no huge wins, but some solid wins- lots of them- and otherwise took care of business.

clearing still had some issues that cost us.  a couple of hanging sticks cost us too.  our assist % still sucks (young team with new personnel) but our SOG% is way up (24/35).  we lost GBs by ten.

mclachlan had a ton of saves- 20- and saw a lot of open shots today (55 total).  also picked a pass late in the game, leading to o'brien's go ahead goal.  oh and, jamo got the rare goalie assist, and an ever rarer SOG!

some good runs from the second mids- correa, kloepfer, williams, dechiaro, and im pretty sure boyle has moved to mid with marino at attack.  cieleski got some runs at LSM.  anderson fagen and kraemer played SSDM.  a good idea in the heat.

in other news- hof blew up delaware in newark, and towson beats drexel.

A great summary, as always COB.

You're spot on about turnovers, stick hanging, and failed clears, as well as assist %. Some of these issues we've been watching for several years now. What felt different about Saturday was how we didn't crumble. We kept fighting. After we came out guns blazing with leads of 5-1 and 6-2, it would have been easy to pack it in after the Stags' 5-goal surge that gave them a 7-6 lead. But we went toe-to-toe the whole game. Fairfield pulled within 5-6 with 14:24 left in the 2nd Q. From that point until 10:02 left in the 4th, neither team had a lead of more than one goal. Four times, Fairfield retook a lead, and we tied them up. We got in our own way plenty of times, but our ability to bounce back and not hang our heads was impressive.

10 ties. 9 lead changes. Some big faceoff wins, big stops, huge goals in crunch time. 75 degrees and breezy and an upset of the last undefeated team in the nation? Hard to top that kind of Saturday afternoon at LaValle. Well done, boys. Keep building on it.

14
Conference and Athletics / Re: Conference Realignment Rumors
« on: March 25, 2025, 02:29:24 pm »
Big news out of the NEC today as Saint Francis elects to transition to DIII after the 2025-26 academic year. They cite the reasons you might expect: transfer portal, NIL, revenue-sharing. This will hardly be the last DI>>DIII move we'll see, right? I fear for the small DI schools where the economics of modern collegiate athletics increasingly don't work.

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/44402532/saint-francis-first-four-loss-moving-division-iii

15
SBU Men's Basketball / Re: Game 24: v Towson, 2/6 6:30pm
« on: February 07, 2025, 10:24:15 am »
We may be one of the best 32 min teams in the conference. We may be one of the worst final 8 minute teams in all of D1.

There was a moment late in the game, where the announcers were saying that Stony Brook had to get Luster going, and he was just standing on the opposite side of the court from the ball doing nothing. I don’t blame him at all, but under Geno, you rarely see good off the ball movement, and you rarely see this team getting high percentage shots in late game situations.

You're spot on. Off-ball movement, breaking the press, in-bounds execution under our own basket--none of these things have been strong in recent years. Talent helps but is not necessary to be strong in these areas. Fundamentals.

Pages: [1] 2