The CAA seems to be morphing into an America East version of FCS football
The CAA is finished. First they make name change, that I find bizarre and wrong, and now they bring in a school like Bryant. Who’s next. Wagner???
Look, I'm not happy with a lot about SBU....but I'm totally fine with this. I think it makes sense.
There was a clear need for one more northern member to make CAA football "whole" and make travel reasonable. Remember, URI was very close to dropping scholarship football and I'm sure programs like Maine and UNH (both solid football programs in the CAA) didn't like the idea of regular travel to Campbell. A round number like 16 is a very reasonable number to build divisions around. It ALSO means that every member gets 7-8 conference games against their regional opponents, making it less challenging to get an ALL D1 non-conference schedule in place, with an FBS game and 2 non-conference D1 opponents.
I'm not sure where the hate is around Bryant either. It's ranked academically ahead of Monmouth, Marist, St. Bonaventure, Siena, and several other regional brands, it has obviously put a TON of money into athletics, its endowment is a few million less than that of Providence, and it has recently had a good deal of success and notoriety.
Yankee:
Maine
New Hampshire
Bryant
Stony Brook
Albany
Rhode Island
Monmouth
Villanova
Dixie:
Campbell
Elon
Hampton
William & Mary
NC A&T
Richmond
Delaware
Towson
So long as you make sure that Delaware and Villanova play each other yearly, I think every member would be very satisfied with that type of travel arrangement.
Me personally: I'd rather see Bryant joint for all sports as well. A better addition with a greater athletic commitment in my opinion than U Albany. It would give a geographic partner to Northeastern, which has always been a bit of an outlier.
I know why the CAA is doing this as well, however. Diluting the conference and bringing in schools just because of their geography does nothing for the RSI of this conference. Schools like Bryant, and NC A&T severely weaken this conference.
Obviously, the CAA doesn't care about the athletics of the institution, but more about close proximity to other schools to play.
If you are comparing conferences. The larger conferences don't pay like this.
I don't necessarily agree that Bryant football dilutes the conference. I also would argue that there are really no other good options that aren't in stable conferences to add. Who else is left? FCS is consolidating like the FBS into conferences that can compete, and conferences that can't. The classic "competitor conferences" are the ones that are stable vs. expanding: MVFC, Big Sky, CAA and SoCon. Southland used to be another, but I argue that their best pieces are now in this United conference that's trying to get to FBS. Then you have a few conferences that are mission-based and generally stable: Patriot, Ivy, MEAC/SWAC.
The only "poachable" players are in the Big South/OVC, NEC, Pioneer, or D2. I looked through the list. There is NO ONE you would want to add from there. Robert Morris is the only program with mild regionality, but I lived in Pittsburgh, it's not a program you want in the CAA.
My **guess** is that this move to 16 is consolidating the CAA to make it as prepared for re-alignment as possible. The only school of that group that has a prayer at this current iteration of FBS is Delaware, and they don't seem to be keen on moving (and if they do, expect Howard to fill the gap). As has been speculated before, when the power programs fully depart the NCAA, there will be reconsolidation of football along regional lines since the money won't benefit nation-wide conferences at this level. The CAA will be ready for this, and potentially competitive in that environment.
I think that is a very reasonable plan, and for the same reason I expect to see 2 more full members added. My guess is that they're Albany and Bryant.