OK e-, let's say that's true. Then the question becomes...Would Stony Brook fans be that much more interested in watching a game vs. Western Michigan or Toledo as opposed to Richmond, William and Mary, or New Hampshire? I'd prefer to watch a rivalry with those CAA teams. I'd bet many (if not most) SB fans would, too. Even if I were wrong, and watching a game against Bowling Green is somehow more compelling than one against Richmond, would it be sufficiently more interesting to make up for dealing with the hassles of traffic, parking, and lines for a 25,000 seat stadium than a 12,000 seat stadium? You may think so, but that's not a good trade-off in my book. Yes, I know it's still years off, but the topic came up in the forum (again) and added my two cents. Bigger is not always better. I think fans would rather see a perennial Top 15 FCS team than one that is lucky every few years if it gets to play in a Toilet Bowl game.